I feel like I’m at Manny’s Deli for lunch, walking down the buffet aisle almost overwhelmed by the tasty options. I’m writing this blog hoping to pick the tastiest threads to weave together.
The Supreme Court ruled that Affirmative Action was unconstitutional at Harvard and the University of North Carolina last week.
At long last, in my opinion.
If there was ever a broken system it was Harvard’s admission to the Freshman class, limited to 2,000 students. First, Harvard had 30 percent of spaces allocated to legacies. These were the children of former graduates, particularly famous and wealthy ones. Then there were the Dean’s choices, mostly top of the class at elite prep schools. Then there were the athletes, who had to have top grades and good test scores–mostly white. This covered 50 percent of the class.
But there was the problem of super smart, dedicated Asian kids who did not fall into any of those categories. Unfortunately for Harvard, there were too many of them. They could easily take up the remaining 50 percent of the class, and the school didn’t want that. Harvard handled its Asian problem partly by taking black students in the name of Affirmative Action, to somehow make up for the endemic racism in America.
Asian parents did not like this result. They viewed it as denying the American dream of being treated equally. They partnered with a dedicated Jewish lawyer, Edward Blum, who sued the college. After almost 10 years in the Courts, and the country swinging away from Harvard’s elitism, they won. Affirmative Action, which was a form of a racist quota according to the Court, was deemed unconstitutional according to the 14th Amendment.
Sadly, the Court did not rule on the issue of 30 percent legacies at Harvard. They also didn’t address the refusal of Ivy league schools to expand their enrollments by using their multi-billion dollar nontaxable endowment funds.
The Court did not look at the huge mess colleges have become, allowing tuition to rise 10 times faster than inflation over the last five decades, much faster than personal earnings have risen. Subsidized college debt was also struck down by the Court, declared a disguise for helping the richer families versus the poorer ones who saw college as beyond their grasp.
****
I could go on and on about the morass of college education in America, but the latest Northwestern University story helps illustrate it in a more colorful way.
Yesterday, Pat Fitzgerald, the esteemed Wildcat football coach, was fired by Northwestern’s president.
The Daily Northwestern, the college student newspaper, had exposed an ugly “hazing” scandal with the team, in which Freshman players who did not do well in practice were “ran,” which meant being put into an empty dark locker room where older masked players sexually mistreated them.
The coaching staff was evidently aware of this conduct and condoned it.
Head Coach Fitzgerald, who had played linebacker and excelled at Northwestern, became its leader after the previous head coach Randy Walker had died unexpectedly in 2006. In 2020, Fitzgerald was awarded a $57 million 10-year contract.
After the The Daily Northwestern piece came out and was corroborated by several other athletes, the scandal was expanded to include racial incidents, and the University President reluctantly gave Fitzgerald the ax.
As a personal aside, when I was applying to colleges I knew not to apply to Northwestern because they had a strict Jewish quota. Things have changed some since, but the Lakeshore Campus in Evanston still sickens me. Recently, the town of Evanston voted to give reparations to Black homeowners whose homes bordered the campus. They had been forced to sell their homes to the university so Northwestern could expand. A small number, perhaps 40, who can prove their families were forced to move out, will get $25,000 from Evanston.
***
Do Northwestern’s transgressions and the Supreme Court’s decisions about Harvard’s Affirmative Action and student loan forgiveness have a common thread in the widespread arrogance of elite colleges?
I think so. Do you?
Question: What are the most important issues American colleges need to solve? What could they do about them?
8 Comments
To start, the Federal government could reallocate some of the $250 billion dollar giveaway to address the mythical climate change crisis in the farcically named Inflation Reduction Act to colleges that agree to lo lower tuition by 2% per year and increase their Freshman class by 6% per year. They would have to add vocational training including
machining, programming, plumbing, etc. Ivys would have to bite into their endowments each year.
Also allow money for new colleges and innovative programs like Hope College’s proposal to abolish tuition with an after graduation payback contract.
I had a good experience at IPFW in Fort Wayne, then Purdue West Lafayette, a total of 4yrs for my BSME with no debt and no family money involved. I was pleased to later see Mitch Daniels take over leadership at Purdue to provide excellent education at bargain prices. He somehow did a great job of cost control, maybe because he had the skill set and he wanted to. Given that man’s experience and results, I’d put money behind his input on this matter and run with it, whatever he says.
Mitch Daniels was the 1 in 100 leader who knew how to run a college. If he wanted to run for President he would have my vote and contribution.
When I started working in this industry with my Dad back in the mid 80’s he stressed that I should avoid discussing politics and religion with my customers as they can be divisive issues that negatively affect business. Thank you for discussing both today in a single column and your willingness to suffer the consequences (if any) for doing so. It’s been an interesting year watching big business get punched in the nose because of their public support of a social/political issue that is antithetical to some portion of their customer base. Do you ever question if there is a cost to discuss some of these issues and whether it is worth paying out of a sense of principal? Is my Dad’s approach right or is yours? I enjoy reading your columns and will continue to do so regardless of what your opinion is on any particular subject.
American colleges are a direct reflection of our society.. When we say in America everyone shall be treated equally no matter what your race or ethnicity is, boy does that sound euphoric and good luck with that. But now lets get down to the how the real world works. Some are born into prosperous families and they by nature get a head start in life. Some get lucky by some life changing happening in life. The majority of us people, regardless of race, have to work their fannies off to be successful in life which is where most of us reside. My view comes down to this, you cannot legislate success in life, if you want to succeed at anything you have to truly pour yourself into making it happen, wala the American dream, which is still alive and well, instead of sitting on the side lines and complaining that life is not fair and we need to legislate fairness.
I generally prefer to avoid politics meaning Republican or Democrat because the fools in Washington are almost equally stupid. Talking about Donald Trump is a no win at this point. I have supported Biden’s actions on Ukraine for the most part but I fear another term which is likely if Trump is the GOP nominee.
Regarding Affirmative Action I do not regard it as a Dem vs GOP issue although the Supreme Court split in traditional style. Quotas are generally unfavorable. The Progressives will shrink in power if they keep pushing for them. Woke is yesterday though the leftist media has not awoken to that. Climate change is number eleven of the public’s top ten issues but again the Progressives have not discovered it.
Scott, be well. Keep gathering my Swarf.
Hi Lloyd,
I’m not sure I agree with your suggestion to increase enrollment size for freshmen class. At elite universities, they would have no problem obtaining applicants. For many other colleges and universities, they wish they had such a problem with excessive applications and selectivity. Many smaller schools are dying on the vine. I think formal higher education has witnessed its high point. Many companies no longer require a 4-year degree. If motivated, kids can learn on their own. Heaven forbid that a student is saddled with 6-figure student debt, especially if they majored in liberal arts. Let me state that I have no problem with students in liberal art studies, but that education is not in demand. Maybe they go on to grad school for law or medicine. STEM is where it’s at for undergrads.
As rapidly as our economy is changing, I’m not sure what jobs would be in jeopardy due to the advances in AI which is coming on much faster than many experts had predicted. Maybe everyone will be replaced by HAL-9000?
https://www.highereddive.com/news/how-many-colleges-and-universities-have-closed-since-2016/539379/
Hi Bob,
The college programs do not have to be 4 year liberal arts. I am all in for vocational and hybrid. Lets get more teachers for charter schools. Robot mechanics will need training and gotta have more machinists for a long time. Also leave a spot for Seniors who will live longer physical therapists.